Update – Financial Impact of Pandemic

In May, Ian Davey, Cobourg’s treasurer, reported on the financial impact of the pandemic plus he forecast the impact for the year.  In September, he reported on the numbers for the first two quarters.  On Tuesday, October 20, he will report the status up to October 15 – and it looks good.  Although revenue is down by $2M,  expenses are also down by $2M.  Add back $400K in extra expenses because of virus protection measures and the net loss is $417K.  But from a Town’s finances point of view, this is more than compensated by Federal/ Provincial funding to date of $678K leaving a net surplus of $261K.  Needless to say, the Town will not be applying for the second phase of the Provincial/ Federal “Safe Restart” program.

So how did this happen?  See the full report in the links below but let me summarize.

Revenues – summary of losses – highlights

Reduced Parking Revenue $516K
Cobourg Community Centre reduced revenue $980K
Concert Hall reduced revenue $163K
Other items $329
Total $1,988K

Expenses – summary of reductions – highlights (excludes some items, see overview summary below).

Transit – Reduced Service $250K
No beach Lifeguards $105K
Community Centre – reduced costs $166K
Concert hall – reduced costs $60K
Tourism – reduced advertising $50K
Special Events – reduced costs $19K
Seniors’ Activity Centre – reduced costs $44K
Other reductions $448K
Total reductions $1,142K


Tax Cancellations  – above budget ($175K)
Other additions ($87K)
Total additions ($262K)

Total net Reduction in Expenses  $880K


Reduction in Revenue $1,988K
Reduction in Expenses ($880K)
Reduced spending on conferences ($80K)
Staffing savings – Details not provided ($1010)
Covid-19 expenses $324K
Estimated Covid-19 Expenses Oct to Dec. $75K
Total $417K

Offset by Provincial/ Federal Funding to date $678K

Net estimated position as of 15 October, 2020      $261K

That’s right, more than a quarter million surplus.

This is the first time (in my recollection) that “staffing” has been reported as a separate line item.  Mostly we get reporting by department where staffing costs are buried.  In the first half report, the biggest saving was in Community Services, so it’s likely that some of the Staffing savings are due to a reduction in hiring of summer students (and perhaps no replacements of turnover).  Ian’s report labels additional details on Staffing as Confidential.  But whatever was done, this reduction in spending was successful in managing the financial problem caused by the pandemic.

Perhaps more details will be provided at Tuesday’s special Council meeting although a closed session is scheduled to discuss this item.


Another View

20 October 2020:  The Cobourg Taxpayers Association has another view of this.  From a cash standpoint, the surplus is $91K, not $261K.  Download their analysis here.

Print Article: 


Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
3 years ago

Rather than an updated budget, the report outlines a number of changes to the Town’s revenues and expenditures.

The report indicates that the Town should expect a $261K surplus. This is misleading in that a number of departmental and reserve transactions are included. These transactions are non-cash and do not affect the Town’s financial status.

The following analysis of the C19 Financial Update #2 adjusts for these internal non-cash transactions and shows a projected surplus of $91,370 instead of $261,445


Last edited 3 years ago by Bryan
John Draper
Reply to  Bryan
3 years ago

Thanks for this alternative viewpoint. I have now added a link (above) to the CTA analysis.

Old Sailor
3 years ago

Hopefully, Mr. Davey has adequately allowed for potential tax revenue losses in his calculations which will result from deferred tax collection policies.

Ken Strauss
3 years ago

According to the report we saved $50K or 10% on utility costs at the CCC. Looked at differently, we wasted $450K to make ice and cool/heat an unused building. That is true management expertise!

Reply to  Ken Strauss
3 years ago

The CCC appears to have almost 50,000 ft² of solar panels on its roof. What effect do they have on mitigating energy costs?

Reply to  JimT
3 years ago

Good question JimT.
The Town doesn’t seem to report the solar revenue in the budget. Perhaps you could ask CFO Davey.

Reply to  JimT
3 years ago

Do they really and truly save any money until they have paid off their actual cost including installation???

Reply to  cornbread
3 years ago

Proper accounting requires that the cost be spread out over the life of the asset, using accrual accounting, otherwise the cost is all up front and any benefit in ensuing years seems to be totally free of cost, which is not really true.

Reply to  JimT
3 years ago

Tell that to the average homeowner.

Reply to  JimT
3 years ago

JimT & cornbread,
You are correct regarding asset costs being amortized over the asset’s useful life. This is how it is done in the private sector.

In the municipal government world, depreciation and amortization are used only for the financial statements. For budgets and management purposes, accounting is done on a cash basis, without depreciation, amortization or accruals.

When the Town buys a truck, the cost is fully allocated to the current year and matched against the revenue source (property tax, development funds, user fees) that paid for it.

This is much the same method that most people use to manage their home “budget”

The federal and provincial governments now use accrual accounting with depreciation and amortization.

A bit of light reading for you. The CD Howe Institute has published research papers on municipal accounting that may be of interest




Last edited 3 years ago by Bryan
Ken Strauss
Reply to  JimT
3 years ago

Insofar as I know the Town of Cobourg has no roof top solar panels. The roof of the CCC is leased to Advanced Solar Investments. See https://cobourg.civicweb.net/document/21741 for information on the lease.

The roof of Northam Building 3 is leased to Orillia Power Corporation. See http://www.ieso.ca/-/media/files/ieso/document-library/power-data/supply/ieso-active-contracted-generation-list.xlsx

Last edited 3 years ago by Ken Strauss
Reply to  JimT
3 years ago

From the links provided above by Ken Strauss, it appears that the Town has simply leased roof space to the owners of the solar panels.
There are questions however:
Does the Town incur additional insurance costs?
Is the Town responsible for roof repairs related/due to the solar panels?
Is the Town responsible for damage to tenants’ property?
Perhaps CFO Davey has the answers.

Last edited 3 years ago by Bryan
Reply to  Bryan
3 years ago

That is very helpful. Thank you both for your informative replies.

Last edited 3 years ago by JimT